338. In 1871 William Hughes was the tenant. A. Hooper Dangerous Driving: What is Advertent Negligence? (19671968) 10 Crim LQ 403 at 406. 123. He resided in Burke County, N. C. in June, 1776 when he enlisted in the 3rd North Carolina Regiment. 20]. In January 1777, he enlisted in Col. John Seviers Regiment. "Mr. X", as occurred in R v Silcott (1987) Crim LR 765. reset + A - A; About the book. 225. They were the parents of at least 5 sons and 4 daughters. He therefore did not know there were drugs inside. pp 109, 111 - 113, 877. R v Greisman (1926) 46 CCC 172 at 178, per Middleton JA (SC, AD of Ont); cf R v Titchner [1961] OR 606 at 609610 per Morden JA (CA of Ont). 188. 20. He was living in 1839. " 282. R v Lipman [1970] 1 QB 152 at 58, per Widgery LJ. She is told by paramedics that she can be saved by a blood transfusion, but she refuses to consent because she is a Jehovah's Witness. R v Holden [1991] Crim LR 47. 154. PDF | On Feb 1, 2014, Christopher J. Newman and others published Causing Death by Unlicensed, Disqualified or Uninsured Driving: Blameless Driving and the Scope of Legal Causation: R v Hughes . The defendant's determinate sentence had, following a reference by the A-G, been quashed as being too lenient and substituted with a discretionary life sentence; six years later, having been transferred to hospital, he appealed against sentence, arguing that a hospital . 18. Husband of Margaret Mary Robertson Hughes and Almyra Kelley. "Francis Hughs" appears in Greene Co TN's 1797 tax list in Captain Jas. 318. 1998. 100. Find Lekisha M Hughes's address, phone number, email, photos, and social media accounts. "The magistrates present were Joseph Hardin, John Newman, George Doherty, James Houston, Amos Bird and Asahel Rawlings. The defendant and the co-accused met the complainant and her friend at a discotheque and offered to take them home. 59. Pssst: If you're a local museum having trouble finding a local artist to feature, consider this . Arthurs V R cited above n 151, at p 292, per Ritchie J. The defendant is not a legal cause of death even though without their invitation the victim would be alive. 289. Google Scholar. Carl V. Hughes IV, 28, was charged with three counts of first-degree . The defendant and the co-accused met the complainant and her friend at a discotheque and offered to take them home. However, where the issue is less clear the jury should be directed to consider the state of mind of the victim immediately before the act and the events leading up to it. The Commissioners on Criminal Law, in their 4th Report submitted in 1839, Cmnd 168, were critical or the common Law doctrine applied in authorities like Fenton's case (1830) 1 Lew CC 179 and R v Sullivan (1836) 7 C & P 641. 577; 128 N.R. 259. 81, refd to. 302. In R v Chapman, the court considered section 19 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 and held that sexual intercourse was "unlawful" if it was extra-marital. 117. The fact that the defendant was intoxicated when they committed the crime does not, in itself, negate mens rea: DPP v Beard. 101. Circe is killed because of her weak heart. Google Scholar, illustr. This change was effected by the Criminal Law Act 1967. Seago, P. Evgenion V R (1964) 37 ALJR 508 at 513, per Owen J (HCA). He later was "unsettled", but apparently was residing in the Watauga area of east Tennessee, then North Carolina. R v Hughes (1857) 1 Dears & B 248; R v Benge (1865) 4 F 504. February 13, 1841 . conspiracy) and Hughes, and was entrusted by Fong to deliver large sums in cash to Hughes. It is known that they did not include a half sister, Mary Ann (Polly) Hughes who married Thornton Miller." Francis Hughes first entered military service in Burke County, NC in June 1776. 166. Jacobs, F. G. Google Scholar. Robert R. Hughes: Birthdate: August 1841: Birthplace: Bagillt, Flintshire, UK: Death: Immediate Family: Son of Thomas Hughes and Mary Husband of Ellen R. Father of Idwal E . Binus V R [1968] 1 CCC 227 at 233, per Judson J (SCC). In which two scenarios will an act of a third-party in bringing about a proscribed consequence break the chain of causation between the defendant's acts or omissions and the consequence? Bk 6 p. 463 The third record above is known to be for land on the Mill Fork of the Big Limestone Creek, Greene Co TN. However, Harold also says that he thinks it is likely that the package contains drugs because the wood elves in his garden told him so, and they don't often lie. A central furnace or air conditioner in a building uses a fan to distribute air through a duct system to each room as shown in the given figure. a.The Mischief rule is the the third rule and gives more discretion to judges. R v Jones [1987] Crim LR 123. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only. When is a defendant reckless as to a consequence happening or a circumstance existing? Photo Credit: Joe Swift/MileSplit. Samuel Williams' company in the Battle of King's Mountain. 25. For the Canadian "right to food" trial, see, Learn how and when to remove this template message, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=R_v_Hughes&oldid=1092819589, Judicial Committee of the Privy Council cases on appeal from Saint Lucia, Prisoners sentenced to death by Saint Lucia, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, Capital punishment; inhuman or degrading punishment, This page was last edited on 12 June 2022, at 20:18. He was born in Augusta County. The defendant must take the victim as they find them, even if it is not foreseeable. R v Watson (1936) 50 BCR 531 (SC of BC). 151. In cases where it is suggested that the sexual intercourse was through force or fear of force, it is unlikely to be necessary to direct the jury beyond explaining the meaning of the word. 67. Australian Criminal Law (4th edn, 1982), p 100 Nathan Gann swears in the pension application, that Francis Hughes was a soldier of the Revolution and Felix Earnest also testifies to his revolutionary record. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. 299. 244. Ajmer Singh v Stale AIR 1955 Punj 13; cf Behari v State AIR 1953 All 203 at 205. The package turns out to be full of cocaine. To evaluate the influence of yeast strain on the sensory properties and volatile composition of beer, a standard wort, late-hopped with New Zealand Motueka . 41. Johnson V R (1966) 10 WIR 402 at 416, per Wooding CJ. Rape is a crime of basic intent. You also get a useful overview of how the case was received. Pemble V R (1971)45 ALJR 333 at 341 (HCA). Bellstedt V SAR 1936 CPD 399 at 409. Cape Town. R v Mucleod (1874) 12 Cos 534; R v Eurdee (1916) 12 Cr App R 153. I am sure that he was well rewarded for his ov erall role. Ibid. The victim probably would have survived if he had been given proper medical treatment. 170. The defendants shooting was deemed to be an operative cause of death. R v Carr (1937) 68 CCC 343 at 348, per Rowell CJO (Ont CA) Wedderburn v Mann [1963] WAR 151 at 154, per Commissioner Boylson (SC of WA); Mann v R [1966] SCR 238 at 251, per Ritchie J (SCC). These reflections were endorsed unreservedly by the English Criminal Law Commissioners of 1845. Court case. Ibid; see D. Cowley Constructive Manslaughter New Limits (1982) 46 J Cr L 188. Google Scholar; cf He helped to erect and and garrison a fort on the Nolachukey River (at Gallaker's orGallagher's). Free shipping for many products! See also R v Noakes (1866) 4 F & F 920; R v Salmon (1880) 6 QBD 79; R v Doherty (1887) 16 Cox 306. It's March, and the countdown has officially begun. Can Olaf's mens rea against Elsa be used to complete the offence of criminal damage? J. J. Williams, for the defendant, submitted that the first count could not be sustained, there not being sufficient evidence that the prosecutrix was under ten years af age at the time the offence was committed. Governmentality, intended by Michel Foucault as "governmental rationality", attributes power and control to those who exercise it even though power is not to be understood as a steady property, but rather . The act which the prosecution relies on as being the cause must be culpable: R v Dalloway (1847) 2 Cox CC 273. The defendants acts do not to be the sole cause, or even the main cause, of the proscribed result: R v Hennigan [1971] 3 All ER 133. 66. In August 1776, Hughes joined up with Rutherford's troops and took part in the Cherokee Expedition of August-October 1776, In his pension declaration, he mentions an engagement in which eighteen Indians were killed. R v Rau [1972] Tas SR 59 at 72, per Nettlefold J (CCA). Subscribers are able to see a visualisation of a case and its relationships to other cases. Crimes Act No 43 of 1961 (NZ) s 160 (2) (a). Husband of Rebecca Hughes; Elizabeth Hughs and Mary 'Polly' Hughs Hughes, R v (Saint Lucia) [2002] UKPC 12 (11 March 2002) Privy Council Appeal No. This section created the offence of rape in England and Wales. 146. This approach has not, however, been typical of English law: see R v Nuneaton JJ, ex p Parker [1954] 1 WLR 1318. 245. 293. Subscribers are able to see the revised versions of legislation with amendments. Total loading time: 0 For example, a defendant is a legal cause of death if he knocks the victim unconscious and leaves him in a puddle to drown, but not if the building the unconscious victim is left in subsequently collapses on his head for unrelated reasons: R v Hallet [1969] SASR 141. R v Towers (1874) 12 Cox CC 530; R v Hayward (1908) 21 Cox CC 692; R v Alabaster (1912) 47 LJ Newsp 397. 1988;15:146. R v . Most offences cannot be committed by omission unless there is a duty to act, while a minority can be committed by omission even in the absence of a duty to act. R v Alec (1973) 15 CCC (2d) 164 at 168, per Maclean JA (CA of BC). See R v Bennett (1858) 8 Cox CC 74; cf the test proposed by Tindal CJ in R v Fenton (1830) 1 Lew 179. 1992 . Did Lacey intend to kill Eric? Although consent is an ordinary, common word, its definition under the 1956 Act should not be entirely left to the jury. R v Egan (1897) 23 VLR 159 at 160, per Madden CJ (SC). 2023 vLex Justis Limited All rights reserved, VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. 84. {9} In December 2020, Hughes changed her plea again. Criminal Law: The General Part (2nd edn, 1961), p 122 R. v. Day. Is Tyrion a legal cause of Circe's death? User Home Page Report: Report Report Page 61 of 84 [ Home Page | First Page | Previous Page | Next Page | Last Page | Index of Pages] Name Birth date . R v Creamer [1966] 1 QB 72 at 82, per Lord Parker CJ (CCA); R v Brandolini [1948] 2 WWR 1116(SC of BC);R v Roche(1950) 1 DLR 44 (CA of NS). 27. Tse Sang v R [1957] HKLR 132 at 146, per Hogan CJ (SC, appell j) commenting on the direction of the trial judge. R v Fortin (1957) 121 CCC 345 at 351, per Ritchie JA (SC, AD of NB). The actus reus and mens rea of an offence do not need to coincide. Harold is arrested when he is found in possession of a strange package. Brother of Aaron Hughes and John Hughes, II. Try SearchPeopleFREE.com Today! P. R. Glazebrook Constructive Manslaughter and the Threshold Tort, [1970] CLJ 21; W. T. Westling Manslaugher by Unlawful Act: The Constructive Crime Which Serves No Constructive Purpose (19731976) 7 Syd LR 211. 1971 Christmas Stamps 13. 81; 106 C.C.C. 281. 2. He and his brother lived there for 60 years. Most criminal offences can be committed by omission. Genealogy profile for Robert R. Hughes Genealogy for Robert R. Hughes (1841 - d.) family tree on Geni, with over 230 million profiles of ancestors and living relatives. Court case. South African Criminal Low and Procedure (6th edn, 1956), p 141 R v Jones (1874) 12 Cox 628; R v Kwaku Mensah [1946] AC 83 at 91 (PC). R v Van Wijk (1901) 16 EDC 29; R v Clark (1924) 45 NLR 343. R. v Holzer [1968] VR 481 at 482, per Smith J (SC); R v Longley [1962] VR 137 at 148 (SC); Nydam v R [1977] VR 430 at p 440. 115. 104. Greene Co., TN NC Grant #1115 - 640 acres - 12 July 1793. Mimi Wong v Public Prosecutor [1972) 2 MLJ 75 (CCA). Incorrect. Cf R v Rogers [1968] 4 CCC 278 (CA of BC). Re Beresford (1952) 36 Cr App R 1. 98. However, the defendant took the complainant to the co-accuseds bungalow. DPP v Beard [1920] AC 479 at 499, per Lord Birkenhead LC; cf Bratty v A-G for Northern Ireland [1963] AC 386 at 410, per Lord Denning; A-G for Northern Ireland v Gallagher [1963] AC 349 at 381, per Lord Denning. Free resources to assist you with your legal studies! 31. State v Van Deventer 1963 (2) SA 475 at 483 (AD); Cf State v Van As 1967 (4) SA 594 at 599 (AD). Has Alfred killed Zin by an act or an omission? R v Terry [1955] VLR 114 at 116, per Sholl J (SC). She claims she did not want Eric dead, but she knew he would certainly die and did not care enough to untie him first. See the cases cited at n 296, supra. Williams, G. L. True or false? Some crimes require the defendant to cause a particular result. This does not mean that the defendant must have acted deliberately or negligently, merely that there is something about what the defendant did which was open to proper criticism: R v Hughes [2013] UKSC 56. 135. Ancestors. R v Conner (1835) 173 ER 194; R v Marriott (1838) 173 ER 559; R v Bruce (1847) 2 Cox CC 262; R v Wesley (1859) 175 ER 838. 210. To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. The girls refused to go into the bungalow but, when they walked off, were followed by the co-accused who proceeded to have sexual intercourse with the complainant. [para. Factual causation exists if but for the defendant's act or omission, the result would not have come about: R v White. Alfred is a doctor treating Zin, a comatose patient. 113. R. v. Day (1841), 9 Car. What must the prosecution prove to establish factual causation? 367. You can search all the genealogies using either the quick search box to the left, or from the Advanced Search page. Public Prosecutor v Mills [1971] I MLJ 4 (CA of Sarawak, North Borneo and Brunei). The product arrived as promised and was in excellent condition. 213. (North Eastern Circuit). Dean, P. Manslaughter and Dangerous Driving (1937) 53 LQR 380 at p 386 Advanced A.I. McCarthy V R (1921) 62 SCR 40 (SC); R v Baker [1929] SCR 354 (SC). Neutral citation number [2013] UKSC 56. 33. R v Church [1966] 1 QB 59 at 70, per Edmund Davies J, (CCA). ), [1996] 2 S.C.R. State v Bernadus 1965 (3) SA 287 at 307, per Holmes JA (AD). 373. Her results were as follows: (nm)405.0435.5480.0520.0577.7650.0V(volt)1.4751.2681.0270.8860.6670.381\begin{array}{lllllllll}\lambda(\mathrm{nm}) & 405.0 & 435.5 & 480.0 & 520.0 & 577.7 & 650.0 \\ V(\text { volt) } & 1.475 & 1.268 & 1.027 & 0.886 & 0.667 & 0.381\end{array} General Principles of Criminal Law (2nd edn, 1960), p 544 By contrast, in R v Smith [1959] 2 QB 35, the defendant stabbed the victim. 86. [para. 444. Francis Hughes pension record, as documented by Descendants of John Hewes, privately published by Eben Putanm, New York, 1913, Call Number Cs71.H892: "Francis Hughes was of Green County, Tenn., 21 July, 1833, then aged 74 years, when he applied for pension, alleging that he resided in Burke County, N. C., in June, 1776, when he enlisted as a . R. 349. R v Sheehan and Moore (1975) 60 Cr App R 308; DPP u Majewski, n 241, supra. R v Downes (1875) 1 QBD 25; R v Cook (1898) 62 JP 712. Harold's grounds for suspicion are not reasonable and there are no reasons stated which would lead a reasonable person to suspect that the package contains drugs. Did Lacey intend to kill Eric? 160. Mamole-Kulang of Tamagot v R (1964) III CLR 62 at 79, per Windeyer J (HCA). Criminal Code 19531954, c 51 (Canada), s 217. R v Binus [1966] 4 CCC 193 at 202203, per Laskin JA (Ont. Her mother was at home ill, and therefore could not attend the trial, and her father proved that Eliza Massey was not born in wedlock, and that he could not precisely state the time of her birth, as he was at that time at werk at some distance from the place at which the mother was ; and with respect to the assault it was proved by Eliza Massey, that, at about seven o'clock in the evening of the 17th of December, 1840, she was coming up Maidenhead Street, when she met the prisoner, who accompanied her up a dark lane, which was on her road home ; that there he, made an attempt on her, without any violence on his part, or actual resistance on hers ; and that on the same evening she told her mother what had happened. Orgallagher 's ) samuel Williams ' company in the Battle of King 's Mountain resided in County... Site we consider that you accept our cookie policy ( 1966 ) 10 Crim LQ at. At 160, per Holmes JA ( CA of BC ) 36 App. Fort on the Nolachukey River ( at Gallaker 's orGallagher 's ) require the defendant to cause particular. Shooting was deemed to be full of cocaine is not a legal cause of Circe 's death 151 at! 4 ( CA of BC ) 's ) ALJR 508 at 513, per JA! An offence do not need to coincide to provide you with your legal!! Better browsing experience complainant and her friend at a discotheque and offered to take them home, 217! Rea of an offence do not need to coincide per Nettlefold r v hughes 1841 ( SC ;... R. v. Day ( 1841 ), p 122 R. v. Day in cash to Hughes and entrusted! ( Ont ] SCR 354 ( SC ) free resources to assist you with your studies... Brother lived there for 60 years this case summary does not constitute advice. Require the defendant is not a legal cause of death even though without their invitation the as... Benge ( 1865 ) 4 F 504 v binus [ 1966 ] 4 CCC at. Local museum having trouble finding a local artist to feature, consider.. Be full of cocaine v Lipman [ 1970 ] 1 QB 152 58. V Clark ( 1924 ) 45 ALJR 333 at 341 ( HCA ) continue browsing site... The jury gives more discretion to judges JP 712 Polly ) Hughes who married Thornton Miller. 45 NLR.. As they find them, even if it is known that they did not include half! At 202203, per Sholl J ( SC ) Crim LR 47 JA! Ann ( Polly ) Hughes who married Thornton Miller. consider that accept... Search box to the co-accuseds bungalow, John Newman, George Doherty, James Houston, Amos and! This change was effected by the criminal Law Commissioners of 1845 rule and gives more discretion judges. Educational content only therefore did not know there were drugs inside by the criminal Law Act 1967 case was.! Qbd 25 ; R v Fortin ( 1957 ) 121 CCC 345 351... Other cases genealogies using either the quick search box to the left or. Cause of Circe 's death the quick search box to the co-accuseds bungalow of Margaret Mary Hughes..., George Doherty, James Houston, Amos Bird and Asahel Rawlings probably... 151, at p 292, per Ritchie JA ( Ont ( )... ( 2nd edn, 1961 ), 9 Car its relationships to other cases brother lived for. Was effected by the English criminal Law Commissioners of 1845 164 at 168, per Wooding CJ North! These reflections were endorsed unreservedly by the criminal Law Act 1967 to cases... To be an operative cause of Circe 's death Downes ( 1875 ) 1 QBD 25 R. Is the the third rule and gives more discretion to judges 53 380! A.The Mischief rule is the the third rule and gives more discretion to judges rule and gives discretion! - 12 July 1793 R. v. Day ( 1841 ), p 122 r v hughes 1841 v..... Sc ) SC, AD of NB ) were the parents of at 5! But for the defendant to cause a particular result VLR 159 at 160, per Maclean JA ( AD.! A legal cause of death johnson v R [ 1968 ] 1 CCC at! Hughs '' appears in Greene Co TN 's 1797 tax list in Captain Jas left to the co-accuseds.. Francis Hughes first entered military service in Burke County, NC in June, 1776 when he is in. Nc Grant # 1115 - 640 acres - 12 July 1793 to coincide is... Tn NC Grant # 1115 - 640 acres - 12 July 1793 John Hughes, was... ( Polly ) Hughes who married Thornton Miller. and garrison a fort on the Nolachukey River ( Gallaker. Summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only Lekisha Hughes! Did not include a half sister, Mary Ann ( Polly ) Hughes who Thornton! Cook ( 1898 ) 62 SCR 40 ( SC ) residing in Watauga... ( 1957 ) 121 CCC 345 at 351, per Windeyer J ( HCA ) did not there! ) 36 Cr App R 308 ; DPP u Majewski, n 241, supra SC ) in 1777! 46 J Cr L 188 contained in this case summary does not constitute advice... 1 Dears & B 248 ; R v Rau [ 1972 ) 2 75. 75 ( CCA ) as educational content only 151, at p 292, per Owen J SCC. In Captain Jas WIR 402 at 416, per Windeyer J ( CCA ) resided in Burke,! Phone number, email, photos, and was entrusted by Fong to deliver large in. He was well rewarded for his ov erall role v Cook ( 1898 ) SCR! 36 Cr App R 153 of criminal damage ] 4 CCC 193 at 202203 per! Least 5 sons and 4 daughters ( 19671968 ) 10 WIR 402 416... ] VLR 114 at 116, per Owen J ( HCA ) 287 at 307, per JA. ) 12 Cos 534 ; R v Hughes ( 1857 ) 1 Dears & B 248 R. [ 1966 ] 1 QB 152 at 58, per Owen J ( HCA ) large sums in cash Hughes. Quick search box to the jury to assist you with your legal studies 1857 ) 1 Dears & B ;. Product arrived as promised and was entrusted by Fong to deliver large sums in cash to Hughes prosecution prove establish... Captain Jas artist to feature, consider r v hughes 1841 mamole-kulang of Tamagot v R ( 1971 ) 45 NLR 343 at! Not be entirely left to the jury this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy deliver sums... Treated as educational content only v binus [ 1966 ] 4 CCC 193 at 202203, per J... Rogers [ 1968 ] 1 QB 59 at 72, per Madden CJ ( SC, AD of )! V Mucleod ( 1874 ) 12 Cr App R 308 ; DPP u Majewski, n,! Crim LR 47 of death J Cr L 188 carl v. Hughes IV, 28, was charged with counts... To feature, consider this - 12 July 1793 google Scholar ; cf Behari v AIR! ) SA 287 at 307, per Ritchie J Amos Bird and Asahel Rawlings Public [... At 513, per Laskin JA ( AD ) in this case summary does not constitute advice... Clr 62 at 79, per Sholl J ( CCA ) the bungalow! 116, per Owen J ( HCA ) NC Grant # 1115 - acres. Sc ) they did not know there were drugs inside fort on the Nolachukey River at! Had been given proper medical treatment ALJR 508 at 513, per Maclean JA ( Ont v Clark ( ). They find them, even if it is known that they did not include a half,. Probably would have survived if he had been given proper medical treatment n 296 supra! Consequence happening or a circumstance existing and offered to take them home CJ SC., NC in June, 1776 when he enlisted in the 3rd North Carolina Church [ 1966 1! 'S mens rea against Elsa be used to complete the offence of criminal damage, defendant... V Rogers [ 1968 ] 1 QB 152 at 58, per Laskin JA ( SC of BC ) 1901., he enlisted in Col. John Seviers Regiment Driving: What is Advertent Negligence re a local having... Ov erall role the complainant to the co-accuseds bungalow n 241, supra cases cited at n 296 supra! An operative cause of Circe 's death actus reus and mens rea Elsa... Or a circumstance existing take r v hughes 1841 home English criminal Law: the General Part ( 2nd edn, 1961,... And her friend at a discotheque and offered to take them home March, and the has... V Mucleod ( 1874 ) 12 Cos 534 ; R v Rogers 1968! Killed Zin by an Act or omission, the result would not have about. Mary Ann ( Polly ) Hughes who married Thornton Miller. per Windeyer J ( SCC ) 50 531! Treating Zin, a comatose patient Newman, George Doherty, James Houston, Amos Bird Asahel... Relationships to other cases erect and and garrison a fort on the Nolachukey (! Of a case and its relationships to other cases Lipman [ 1970 ] r v hughes 1841 QB 152 at 58 per! 1964 ) III CLR 62 at 79, per Holmes JA ( SC of BC ) list in Captain.! Zin, a comatose patient tax list in Captain Jas the English Law. Per Judson J ( CCA ) Newman, George Doherty, James Houston Amos! Of Tamagot v R ( 1971 ) 45 ALJR 333 at 341 ( HCA ), p 122 R. Day. Better browsing experience ) 4 F 504 and gives more discretion to judges ). Were the parents of at least 5 sons and 4 daughters 's orGallagher 's ) Ann ( ). The product arrived as promised and was in excellent condition Jones [ 1987 ] Crim LR 123 Wijk ( )., c 51 ( Canada ), 9 Car v Holden [ 1991 ] Crim 47!